From: Bruno Haible Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:38:12 +0000 (+0200) Subject: stdbool: Drop old BeOS support that gets in the way of ISO C 23 support. X-Git-Tag: v1.0~2119 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a333fce3237ccf88065ecdea1e8cb22465bba598;p=gnulib.git stdbool: Drop old BeOS support that gets in the way of ISO C 23 support. * lib/stdbool.in.h: Don't include . --- diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 6029c731a2..8736a82d1e 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2022-08-15 Bruno Haible + + stdbool: Drop old BeOS support that gets in the way of ISO C 23 support. + * lib/stdbool.in.h: Don't include . + 2022-08-15 Bruno Haible tempname: Fix a comment. diff --git a/lib/stdbool.in.h b/lib/stdbool.in.h index 03840f10fc..2fa46724b2 100644 --- a/lib/stdbool.in.h +++ b/lib/stdbool.in.h @@ -58,27 +58,11 @@ /* 7.16. Boolean type and values */ -/* BeOS already #defines false 0, true 1. We use the same - definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them. */ -#if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__ -# include /* defines bool but not _Bool */ -# undef false -# undef true -#endif - #ifdef __cplusplus # define _Bool bool # define bool bool #else -# if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__ - /* A compiler known to have 'bool'. */ - /* If the compiler already has both 'bool' and '_Bool', we can assume they - are the same types. */ -# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ -typedef bool _Bool; -# endif -# else -# if !defined __GNUC__ +# if !defined __GNUC__ /* If @HAVE__BOOL@: Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when the built-in _Bool type is used. See @@ -98,10 +82,10 @@ typedef bool _Bool; "Invalid enumerator. (badenum)" with HP-UX cc on Tru64. The only benefit of the enum, debuggability, is not important with these compilers. So use 'signed char' and no enum. */ -# define _Bool signed char -# else +# define _Bool signed char +# else /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it. */ -# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ +# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ /* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as enum constants, not only as macros. It is tempting to write @@ -112,7 +96,6 @@ typedef bool _Bool; (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)). So add a negative value to the enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'. */ typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; -# endif # endif # endif # define bool _Bool