From 25b6b5120113989e0b91de9d0b75d3d625bbc753 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:20:14 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] * doc/gnulib-readme.texi (Portability guidelines): ctype.h, not ctime.h. --- ChangeLog | 7 +++++-- doc/gnulib-readme.texi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index b50db1ce78..0908d93857 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ 2012-12-27 Paul Eggert + * doc/gnulib-readme.texi (Portability guidelines): + ctype.h, not ctime.h. + Correct name of POSIX.1-2001. * doc/posix-functions/fgetc.texi (fgetc): * doc/posix-functions/fgets.texi (fgets): @@ -24147,7 +24150,7 @@ assume , ..., exist For years gnulib has been assuming the existence of the headers - , , , , , + , , , , , , , , and . Omit checks for them, since they don't appear to be needed. * README (Portability guidelines): Document this. @@ -80131,7 +80134,7 @@ * lib/wcwidth.h: Declare nothing if !HAVE_WCHAR_T. Provide a fallback declaration for wcwidth. - * lib/mbswidth.c: Restore the includes of and . + * lib/mbswidth.c: Restore the includes of and . 2006-06-28 Bruno Haible diff --git a/doc/gnulib-readme.texi b/doc/gnulib-readme.texi index 2370efb4ec..1ce104c716 100644 --- a/doc/gnulib-readme.texi +++ b/doc/gnulib-readme.texi @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ are not testing these platforms very often. Because we assume a freestanding C89 compiler, Gnulib code can include @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, and @code{} unconditionally. It can also assume the existence -of @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, +of @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, and @code{}. Similarly, many modules include @code{} even though it's not even in -- 2.39.5