From cd3725d66cfb18e2742686d6cf010c5bda9b60db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "G. Branden Robinson" Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 01:06:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Clarify age of . * doc/gnulib-readme.texi (C language versions): Mention when first appeared. Copyright-paperwork-exempt: Yes --- ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ doc/gnulib-readme.texi | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 866b0a4d65..7379ca799d 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2025-05-01 G. Branden Robinson (tiny change) + + doc: Clarify age of . + * doc/gnulib-readme.texi (C language versions): Mention when + first appeared. + 2025-05-01 Bruno Haible vc-mtime: Add API for more efficient use of git. diff --git a/doc/gnulib-readme.texi b/doc/gnulib-readme.texi index 3d2d09fefb..bbdefa6c29 100644 --- a/doc/gnulib-readme.texi +++ b/doc/gnulib-readme.texi @@ -332,8 +332,9 @@ of @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, @code{}, and @code{}. Similarly, many modules include @code{} even though it's not -in the C standard; that's OK since @code{} has been around nearly -forever. +in the C standard; that's OK since @code{} has been around +@c https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/include/sys/types.h +since Seventh Edition Unix (1979). Even if the include files exist, they may not conform to the C standard. However, GCC has a @command{fixincludes} script that attempts to fix most -- 2.39.5